ignorante
02 aprile 2015 23:02
"..per dare la possibilità di non essere necessariamente costretti a comprare farmaci con questi principi attivi in farmacia..."
e parliamo di 5 piante???? o ci fanno o sono scemi!!!!
Un paziente ha bisogno di molte piante e pure di diverso tipo (lo sanno in parlamento che la cannabis non è tutta uguale?!).
la verità, ahimè, è che anche negli USA storiche associazioni antiprobizioniste (sovvenzionate da Soros) e sto parlando di NORML, MPP .. stanno proponendo leggi per l'autoproduzione che permettono solo 5 piante.
E' SCANDALOSO!!!..diamoci una mossa e prepariamoci al peggio!!
stanno mettendo i paletti per spianare la strada all' industria della marijuana, ovvero BigTabacco (Giacchetti la venderebbe già nei tabaccai)
PLEASE SHARE - MARIJUANA MOVEMENT BEING SOLD UNDER THE BUS!
Sounds like Ohio is getting screwed by the same groups pretending to represent marijuana who are over restricting and paving the way for big Tobacco.
This issue of the severe restriction of home cultivation really needs to be addressed.
The groups that are pretending to work for the cannabis consumer all these years are clearly selling them out what is with four plants? how stupid is that? And they have to register with the police we saw how well that went in Canada why was that written in there?
The cannabis consumers that have supported norml for 50 years are totally being thrown under the bus.
Sure we do not need a "free for all" but at the same time it is MPP, norml, Exedra that are writing these initiatives.
All this of course is clearly paving the way for big Agri and Big Tobacco and you know it I know it everybody knows it.
But why sell out the little guy? to sell them out! why is it really necessary to eliminate any competition at all?
Yes people will not continue to pay three or four hundred dollars an ounce for marijuana if they can feel free to grow it at home without being harassed. That's the bottom line here. Why would they Limit to a ridiculous 4 plants? And in Colorado 3 flowering plants that's a joke!
And Washington State is the biggest joke of all!
I 502 was not legalization!! So why does norml keep calling I 502 legalization? Why are they trying to lie to people?
But the big one will be California 2016 as the big money of course is going to try to eliminate prop 215 and our unlimited cultivation rights that exist under it prop 215 already.
This will be the big one to watch California 2016. Soros, who funds the current direction of OVER-restrict, OVER-regulate, marijuana movement. Most people don't grasp just how evil that man is and what he does out in the world and his ties with Monsanto and chem trail companies, and of course why not he's got massive stocks and chemotherapy companies also.
yeah let's let them grow us pot and sell it to us at prohibition prices.
The real issue is that people are beginning to wake up and realize that norml has sold amount all these groups are funded by essentially the same people multiple groups when they really have the same agenda which is to over- restrict over -regulate and pave the way for big tobacco and you know what they drip tobacco in massive pesticides.
There is absolutely no reason to have little or no plant numbers for home cultivations and absolutely no reason for them to have to register and that is the agenda of big tobacco and it is really really sad because I remember sending money to norml back in the seventy's.
ennius4531
03 aprile 2015 11:53
Il movimento 5 stelle,con questa sua proposta, ha voluto mostrare di non essere dammeno del suo capo guru in fatto di doti di natura.. mattacchionica !
Ma come,facciamo mille sforzi per dare agli ammalati preparati terapeutici sicuri e certificati e questi buontemponi di grillini autorizzerebbero la produzione fai da te facendoli diventare un prodotto da... orto ?
E, poi, perché 5 piantine ?
Ah! Forse perché richiamandosi alle 5 stelle i beneficiari si ricorderebbero per chi votare ?
pettine
09 aprile 2015 12:38
fa ridere che quando ci sono proproste in qiuesto senso scatta sempre l'ammonimento: "bisognerà pensare molto bene ad eventuali paletti per permettere la coltivazione della cannabis..."
certo, perchè sarebbe un problema molto grave se poi qualcuno sforasse le 5 piante o se, udite udite, qualche ex spacciatore (leggasi cosumatore pizzicato dalla fini-giovanardi incostituzionale) osasse coltivare.
bhangdrink
14 aprile 2015 14:48
ma se uno si sente bene a coltivare il proprio giardino e a consumarne i prodotti a voi che vi frega 5 piante o sei se bastano se non bastano finto di coltivare le prime seminerai le seconde che vuol dire..